refurbished sony a7iv

In thinkbaby thinkster blue by

Its the best of all worlds. The center point, while a stop less sensitive than the 6D, does have a neat trick in the form of spot focus, making the point much smaller than the 6Ds which again helps with precision focus at ultra-wide aperture when aiming for the eyes. http://www.sumeetmoghe.com/2014/02/field-testing-bigron-aka-tamron-150.html, very helpful I was going get the canon 100-400mm but I think I will go for tamron ps 150-600 VC USM and I have canon 70D what do think you think I get the tamron Manoj Dhaka Rohtak Haryana. Another complaint from rhe forums was the ability to focus in low light levels and suspect that the average complainer did not factor in the very narrow depth of field at f/1.2. I bought the Samyang 12mm f/2 lens a few months ago for my Fujji XT1 and I can confirm that it is an exceptionally good lens at a great price. The STM wins at 24mm. A 20(ish) MP sensor isnt going to take full advantage of the resolution, but you definitely see a big difference in the image quality nonetheless. The Alpha 7 IV also includes unique video tools such as breathing compensation, a digital audio interface to attach professional audio microphones and a heat dissipation structure for long recording sessions. i guess that pretty much make me confident to grab one of this lens for traveling without much regret. Ill continue to use my Nikon for Wildlife and depending on the dynamic range they pull from the A7rIII for landscape as well. DXO is not overly transparent as to how they arrive at their conclusions which can be a bit odd sometimes. Is that correct? Keno states, at least for the 1.4 that they CANNOT be usedThanks, Robert. Think I will give it a try. Yes. Cathy, Im glad to have helped. When using tubes greater than 31mm, magnification (still at MFD) turns greater at the 100mm end as you move even closer to the subject. Both Sigma and Tamron have been pushing the envelope that last 18 months, and I think that should be a great motivator for the first party manufacturers. If you have another problem, just email Amplis and let them know the details of your order and what you are trying to do and they assured me they will process it for you. And have just added the Tamron 15-30/2.8. It helps fund this site! I originally thought it was a focusing issue as well as the guys down at my local camera shop. I thought it would be a great telelens, as I like its design, but I don't recommend to buy it. Thx for the afford and time to share you're experience with us Dustin. I feel most of the times 400 on 5D3 is not sufficient especially for birds. We kept trying different settings and it all seemed random at first. Thank you for all your good work on this site. Unser kompetentes & sympathisches Kundenservice-Team steht Dir von 8 - 18 Uhr zur Verfgung. It sounds very, very interesting. I looked into the 70D, and its autofocus and flip-out screen were very tempting. I don't think I've ever seen so many photographers (and I use that term loosely) get so emotional about an equipment release. Real world shots stopped down are fantastic with great sharpness and bite. George, thanks for the great (and real) feedback. There is a Mitakon 50mm f/.95 lens, but it is for a mirrorless APS-C system, so this lens still trumps it when paired with a full frame sensor. Your reviews have a nice conversational tone and give the potential purchaser practical insight into what to expect, (your comment about "learning" the lens was encouraging). The 6D is the better travel body for sure, but the auto focus on the 5D3 is vastly superior for anything moving, and also is a better match for macro shooting or precise f/1.2 focusing off-center with the 50/1.2 L for portraits. With groundbreaking performance in both still and movie recording, the a7 IV is the ideal hybrid, providing breathtaking imagery along with connectivity for on-the-spot delivery and distribution. Then you are left with a fixed focal length lens of great performance that weighs as much the excellent Canon 24-70 f2.8 II. Manfrotto Lumie Musealways new gadgets in the market though, so. Seems like it could be a good to great portrait lens. The 70-300L is a wonderfully sharp lens, but it would be fighting a serious battle against physics here //. great article and a great site too youve convinced me to take the plunge!! The Canon EF 40mm would provide nearly the same field of view on my camera as the Canon EF-S 24mm would (effective focal length of 38mm, on a full-frame camera (that EF-S lenses cant be mounted to anyway))? I find them a joy to shoot and a challenge to focus, even with the addition of a precision focus screen to my Canon 6D. The details about use with an M3, along with your related review of the M3 body itself, were all the more helpful to me, because I'm planning to purchase either an M3 plus this lens, or a G3 X, as a bridge camera for vacation travels. I do like the Tamron 150-600, but just know that it is a fair bit larger. Thank you, great work! It is praised for its compact size, but the IQ has left most people disappointed, and the bokeh is thought to be a little odd. Fills in a current big gap for Canon shooters. I am going to buy a telephoto lens. Two comments about your test shots: first, family game night shots. cheers! Were going to do some research on this place for our large family trip. And how would I or-set the aperture to f8 and pre-focus it to get everything in focus? In comparison most Canon and Nikon lenses are just crap. I leave that to a DSLR. That may be possible with a Sony, perhaps, but the mounts dont work that way in a Canon infrastructure. The tension between the colours of the light in the shadows & sun makes it even more interesting. Maybe Tamron will acknowledge this issue and re-chip the lens within the 6-year warranty? Otherwise they work great. For events I like to use the 5D3 with the 50/1.2 L (I adore this lens for events) and the 6D with the 35/1.4 L II, which is far less finicky with precision focus. My reviews are not about chart measurement anyway, but, as you rightly pointed out, the slight variance in focus essentially invalidates the comparison for testing definitive sharpness. Good price and very excellent construction. Thanks again! Financial Services Register no. / Krister. Ive started to hear feedback from Nikon users (very pleased!) Amir, thats interesting. I actually wrote an article about that here: http://bit.ly/1bPDF2M. ** Generalberholte Elektronik im Vergleich zum Zustand "Neu" auf unserer Seite. Of course, there is also the aperture (DOF @ f2 is about twice than @ f1.4), There is also a typo on Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L II USM section: 20 foot is in fact 5 foot. Thats a tough question. You can find some of those images at either Google+ or Flickr that will give you that information. much appreciated. Um weiterhin alle Funktionen einwandfrei nutzen zu knnen, solltest du ihn aktualisieren. In real world people look at the photos because of the "artistic point of view" that imspires them and not often the sharpness of the image. My dilemma comes when people start talking about sharpness. Did you try the 44-2 on the 6D? Great review. hi Dustin! Love your site ! If you already had a large zoom in your bag, which of the three would you go for? I'm going to buy either the Canon 16-35 f4 or the Tamron 15-30mm. The 145mm Your photo of the snow is wonderful, is a master class shot!! Zubehr, Alle Do you know if this lens works well with a teleconvertor? Thanks, George. He mentions he is using a 70D about a third of the way into the review. Check the comparison here: http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=278&Camera=453&Sample=0&FLI=0&API=0&LensComp=972&CameraComp=453&SampleComp=0&FLIComp=4&APIComp=0. Ive just returned from a vacation that I used the lens almost exclusively on. Dustin thanks for the detailed review It works wonderful with 6D Wifi and even have an special LRTimelapse mode for best results in Holy Grail Workflow. In-depth review with great samples. The extra 200mm on the Tamron is going to help a lot! And with autofocus, VC, and the new calibrating tool Tamron has introducedI would say, a winner. When I had the Canon 60D, the Samyang size was not a problem, but now I don't know. Must have cost you a lot of time Did you also test it on a crop? The Rokinon is my favorite lens for night work because the coma is so well controlled. Howdy! , Thanks for the feedback, Matthew. (Great company to deal with), Nice and indeed very informative review Dustin. Thank you very much for this review! Ich verkaufe [shoplink 41069 ebay]FE 24-240mm[/shoplink], APS-C cameras: Calibration helped but not so much as I would wish. Mainly just for general picture taking, portraits, landscapes etc.. I may shoot an episode on that. The six year warranty period (if you are in North America) should help with the peace of mind. Could not find any problem or reason to return the lens. I own the Tamron 150-600, but am considering buying the 100-400 L II and a Kenko 1.4 Pro 300 DGX TC (which I already own) with it. If that doesnt solve your problem, I would either exchange the lens (if possible) or send it in for service. 135mm APO was not as comfortable to handle compared to the new designs. Have you noticed any Swirly bokeh with this lens? Today I went to 3 shops to no avail as it's so new none of them had them in stock. By seeing all the AF challenges (especially in the low light environment) people have with Sigma, I decided to buy the Canon one. It looks like youre trying to focus in darkness, when you barely see your object through VF, and the camera is always seeking the focus point for several moments before giving the confirmation. I cant say that I experienced either of your issues, nor have I read similar reports from either reviewers or other users. your suggestion is must reqired about some lenses which one is great for landscape which one is great for wild sports and family which one is great for wedding so suggest some lenses i m confused about purchasing also suggest some carbon tripod with some ball heads i m waiting for your mail I find that the Canon bodies do the same, so, for example, the 50mm Makro Planar that I am reviewing right now shows up the same as the Sigma 50 ART (just as 50mm) in the camera body. Its a great optic for the price! I think you will find the 24-35mm pretty confining if it is your primary lens. He does a great review on a 70D body. Luka, thanks for the feedback. Best regards! I havent actually seen any Nikon reviews yet, so I dont know if there any of the lenses in the wild yet. Youll enjoy the Helios. I must admit your other reviews were partially responsible for this decision. Could you please provide some info as to what type ot lens plate will fit the lens. Here you can read witch lenses should need that update, later lenses already have them: http://www.tamron-usa.com/about/updates_canon.php. If not, the older lens is still a very good one. I was afraid of such answer I decided to wait. Id appreciate knowing if this sounds at all familiar from your experience with the Rokinon 50mm f.1.2 or if youd surmise that I have a defective example, well outside of spec. The focus is more accurate, the IS is much better, it has less CA, ghosting, and improved contrast and flare resistance. I have also had it take a picture which when played back was an alternating white then black screen. Looks like you have a pretty decent grasp on the lens. I may have run into that limitation, too. Im also into old glass, using among others an aluminium 13 aperture blade Helios 58mm f/2. 3 archaic : talk or report of a notable person or event. Its a great focal range. Odd. It seems you're using only 67mm circular filters with this lens But maybe you have an idea? But that was happening in well lit hall, where my 40/2.8 focused almost instantly. Here I found a small set of photos which briefly show strong points of 50L: http://www.josephjamesphotography.com/lenses/50L/, Anton Im glad you have enjoyed your 50L. It will come in a Sony mount, but the Sony version doesnt have VC as Sonys stablization is USUALLY in camera, but not on the A7R from what I understand. I'm currently torn between keeping my 80-200mm f/2.8 lens (older nikon pro telephoto zoom) which I use with a Tamron teleconverter and getting this lens, but I think I can do without an f/2.8 telephoto lens as I'm not a wedding photographer. After looking at a few of the blog posts on your web site, I dont want to spend money in wrong buying. If it was an M mount lens they would fix the problem without a question, but since it isnt. Aus diesem Grund werden alle unsere elektronischen Gerte grundstzlich als nicht wassergeschtzt verkauft. I didnt not test it for night performance other than to do a moonshot (which it did great for). The lens isnt diffic to meter with in AV mode or in manual using the viewfinder. I like to take timelapse and now I can relax and let the app do the job. Really enjoyed the shots of it used as a more all-purpose lens opposed to other review locking it into a macro lens group only. The two bodies together (both obtainable at very low auction prices, indeed, if youre willing to take that route with its risk for hassles) give me a very economical best of both worlds lightweight mirrorless pairing in view of the fact that I dont personally require fast AF from this pair. I think you would enjoy the lens. Definitely, if positioned the right way. Also the Rok 14/2.8 and 24/1.4=the classic choice for wide-field astro. Wolverhampton, Your mileage may vary, as they say. Great rendering of the OOF areas. Not a good average. The pricing in different markets are more extreme and makes the newer lens more compelling. Just wondering if you would say that the 100-400mm L ii is a more limiting lens in focal length of the 70-300L in terms of utility under a variety of lighting conditions ? What elements of the pic were changed in your software? Thanks for being out there. I am eagering to find the replacement for my good old EF50/1.4 USM, and after reading this review I was absolutely sure, that this is the solution. This is a fantastic review! Thank you! 5 1 / 4 x 3 7 / 8 x 2 3 / 4 inches (From grip to monitor)), 2022CENTRES DIRECT (OPERATED BY CEFA-SOFT LIMITED ON BEHALF OF UK SONY CENTRE OPERATORS). And I don't find any alternatives, in this price range, for an ultra-wide MF lens. I've been very pleased with my Tamron 70-300 SP VC USD and look forward to putting my tax return into Tamron's latest offering. You dont need to worry about that. Going beyond retail means delivering more opportunity, security, and flexibility for all. My only full frame camera is a Sony A7R. I was trying to see passed year that was is the step for me into the world of photography and product photography and landscape are my favorites that sticked with me. Since first taking up with SLRs many decades past, I quickly found the typically 52mm F.O.V. I have the D7100. I have the Kenko 1.4 and 2x Pro DGXs. how about the built in time lapse function in the 80D. I just got the Fotodiox Pro M42 adapter and it is very nice. I was putting hopes on mRAW feature to conserve space in my archive, but the quality appeared not good enough in comparison with approx. Did you or anyone else you know, use this lens on an APS-C sensor body, if so, what kind of results did they have? adapter but Im having more success achieving accurate focus with manual so Im going to swap to the Samyang to save some pennies for the Sony Zeiss 35 1.4 lens. Does this lock at a particular zoom position or at any zoom position throughout the zoom range? As a part-time photographer the dual-card 5D3 was the only choice of bodies, but as an upgrade to my 50D for my second body I would now consider the 6D instead of saving up for a second 5D3. HA1 1BE, 101/103 Vicar Lane, In manual focus mode, with the switch set to MF, I feel like a lens shouldnt be dealing with electric motors at all. Any reviews on that? Caleb, thats an excellent review with a lot of great images in it. Because of this article. What setting did you use ? AF hunts a bit more, but it did AF. I bet does ducks are remote controlled. 270mm compare with 300mm is not a big difference; however, the ability to capture at 16mm is another "HUGE" advantage compare to 18mm. However, the noise and jpeg compression affect IQ. The Tamron Japan didnt reply why other Tamron lens can be used with M3, but just said their Di and Di II lenses are not designed for Mirrorless Cameras, they cannot guarantee the performance on mirrorless camera bodies. Im afraid your experience is pretty unique. I'm convinced the Canon 6D is the best value FF camera in the market at this timeThanks for your dedication to the craft!!! You just solved 1 week of unnecessary stress about what lens to by. Maybe Nikon and Canon think so as well and give their lenses an adaquate build Thank you for every other great post. 16-35 f4 is (covers 35) I change my aperture (and depth of field) depending on how much I want to have in focus. Many thanks for this very clear and well presented tutorial,so helpful. Great review! Im sort of rambling now, so Im sorry if Im not making much sense. Chris. I am, however, comparing it to the Voitlander 20mm f/3.5. I decided ISO performance, and overall premium qualities of the 6D were more important to me for now. After all the fiftys you reviewed, I would love to know your definitive opinion in relation to its primary competitor. Pride of ownership does not translate into stunning images. In other words there was noticeable lag between half-pressing the shutter button and confirmation that its possible to shoot even if I focused on the same object several times. I love the reviews . Interesting. True 1:1 macro (I just had to find out) is reached at 100mm by adding a 13+13+21+31mm tube combination. But this one, is 100% zeiss! That isnt necessarily my strength as a photographer, so I havent used the lens in that fashion a lot. Unfortunately, the mRAW image from 6D was the most blurred. Im confident the focus problems are not QA related but a design flaw.Realistically the 3-5ft distance is the most reliable focus range and makes the most sense for these fixed focal lengths. Thank you.. I should have one soon, and, when I do, Ill definitely be reporting on it. Good day, mr. Dustin Abbott. As far as stealing the show Tamron has sold a BUNCH of these lenses already, so I expect they are feeling pretty good. Samyang has just announced a filter holder for this lens at a better price than any other I have seen: http://samyang-europe.com/index.php/new-products/samyang-filter-holder-sfh-14. I will try this lens in a few weeks and can compare it to the new 600mm IS2 from Canon. To get a stabilizer and good focus aids would help a TON! Thanks much for all your imput, very well done. That would give me a much better idea of its sharpness compared to my current lenses. excellent walk through, i for one have a whole stack of Images taken on such overcast days sitting in my hard drive waiting to be brought back to life. At the moment i don't have the ef-m to ef lens adapter but i might as well decide to get it. Konsolen, Alle JPB. Excellent review (as usual) Dustin! Love the images that the Soul behind them brings to life & light. I bought it that day, and am completely satisfied with this awesome little lens. Thank you, Vitaliy. No concerns about being disappointed with the optics, so as long as the focus process works for you, you are golden! 2 Jahre Professionelles Musikvideo in NRW Dreh und Schnitt mit Sony a7 IV und Premiere Pro mit Performance Hiermit verkaufe ich meine obige Kamera im TOP-Zustand. That is a great price. Wir garantieren fr alle Gerte einen technisch einwandfreien Zustand. I shot the 35 at f/2 unless I need more depth of field. I think you will find that a great combination in focal length, image quality, and focus operation. Thanks for the feedback. Thank you very much! Cheers from Croatia. We were able to shoot in the birthday party of my son and conducted the video recording. If you local dealer is quoting a higher price, preorder the lens from Amplis through the link above and the coupon will give you 5% to get the price down even lower. I was looking at the Nikkor 24-120mm f4 vr2 however I really wanted a f2. I normally shoot a standard Canon 60D and full spectrum 60D. A Milvus 1.4/50 is schedule for the latter portion of this month. From what you say it sounds better and I'm inclined to go with the new lens, which of course has an advantage of a wider range. Lovely lens, loved the colour, contrast, sharpness but the auto-focus is miserable, in my experience particuarly bad in Ai-Servo mode. * The apparently next generation fast autofocus on Canons latest kit zoom offering might swing the weight of opinion in the direction of accepting that particular set of compromises for some budget conscious users. A lot of Japanese manufacturing has been hard hit in recent disasters, though. I am wondering if you view the 35mm as complimentary or an upgrade to the 40mm? I am also trying to shoot all my images in both orientations. It works pretty well as a portrait lens on the system and mounts well. Some very valid points! Dave, after evaluating the issue I went ahead and purchased one. Because, while I understand it is in every sense of the word, more camera than most need, a little tiny voice in the back of my mind keeps popping up and saying what about those few times you do shoot sports of birds. This is a significant improvement in every way, including optically. With all the hype surrounding the Sigma Art series I began scouting for a fast prime to complement my zoom arsenal and the 135L. I doubt, however, that the Zeiss beats the Sigma in sharpness even at that point, although I do prefer the drawing and bokeh from the Zeissalong with the color rendering. I would suspect that the 70-300 is slightly better at the focal lengths that the two overlap. Thats a tough one, Victorien. The canon 50mm f1.2L and the 1.4 both have the hot spot issue.but the nifty fifty 1.8 and 1.8II don't. Thanks for the nice feedback, Vince. Good deal eh!! Great review, lot's of useful information ! Im glad the lens is working out for you; it is a great travel option! Loved your article. Ill take a look at your website when I get a chance. I have not completely tested the focus problems mentioned here http://www.lenstip.com/472.1-Lens_review-Tamron_SP_85_mm_f_1.8_Di_VC_USD_Introduction.html related to focus accuracy up close being better than at a greater distances and if you correct for one you have the problems in another. Ive been following your reviews for a while now and I have to say that your reviews are the best quality Ive been able to find on the Web. Thanks for this wonderful review! Anyway, keep up the good work and good luck in your business. if you compared at all? [shoplink 41065 ebay]Sony A7r[/shoplink] How are you getting on with that lens? 10 days and 3500 miles. here is my idea: i wanna use this 50-100mm lens with my FX camera at its 80 to 100mm range. Enjoy! I'm currently using my Tokina 17-35 f/4 and really like it but i'm always looking for better quality with selling my househahahahaha. Tamron 15-30mm unless I need to sub out for a screw on ND or CPL (or both). Perhaps it will come with the M4. I look forward to seeing and reading your reviews. Back off from infinity focus a bit and see if that helps solve your problem, or focus on something closer than infinity. I would be much interested on 24mm and 85mm primes for general low-light and portrait photography, respectively, on my crop body. I own the Tamron, but will but will buy the 100-400mk II and the 7DII as I feel on my 7 week safari trip it will be more versatile and less cumbersome. I juse a Cokin Z-pro system on my FE 16-35mm; it works but is cumbersome. It's actually a quite interesting lens for travel, moreover with a wide angle lens to cover the under 24mm area. I think cropping would achieve better results. The focus ring is thin but buttery smooth, precise and very sure for manual focus control. Thank you, Dustin, for the wonderful review. The last sunset shot melts my heart. RG21 7JR, Resorts World Birmingham Unit 44, Pendigo Way, Looking at the greats shots you've taken, there is indeed that "magic" you talked about. He was working with much better light than at any point that I had the lens (January is not an overly inspiring month around here!! I should point out that it works just fine with an EOS-M that I have, They should print a warning on the lenses or something! For me and my pocket, Canon f2 looks like a winner. I've searched on internet for months about this lens! The Canon is definitely a lot lighter and more compact, so if you are doing a lot of trekking, I suspect that it is the better choice for you. Tamron has stopped supporting their teleconverters. My friend who purchased this lens for her T3i for vacation was absolutely impressed with the quality of the image (up to 250mm), auto focus and VC performance while capturing some birds in fly. Better AF, better IQ, and better focus accuracy. The new 1.8 lenses are all sharp but thats about it. Looks like the waiting list is adding up! I was about to order the new Canon 16-35 f4, but I think I will go for the Tamron based on your excellent review. They are all good just slightly different enough to meet different needs. In my local store this lens costs $200 more. Ca.3000 Auslsung,es werden keine dazu Verkaufe ein Godox TT600 zusammen mit Godox X1T fr Sony Kameras If wedding photography is your main pursuit, I would say that this lens is the better choice. Thats a good question to ask the app developer. The lions dont wait. Have you used either on the 100-400 II Canon? This zoom range is the next on my to buy list and wanted to know since I was leaning towards the Sigma. Ill do a landscape and another general purpose series as well. I must say that my 100-400 old version is only 3 years old. Thanks I am presently Nikon (FF) user however I might go to Canon full frame body as I will work on wildlife and bird photos. Thanks for your review which as always I enjoyed reading. Pitch / yaw shake only. Likewise, f/8 and T/11 correspond to the same aperture and give the same rendering. I'll be interested to read reviews of the Otus on the 5Dsr. Alberto, I didnt really find the AF slow on the 35 overall, but I did note that it was more likely to hunt a bit than the Canon 35 IS. Schnelle Lieferung, sehr gerne wieder. But 200 mm is a lot. My intention is to use the equipment to shoot an artistic installation with the following criteria: In both cases, sharpness and a bokeh quality are important for making the decision. Now, may be that 1080p video does not require a L lense anyway, being just about a 1/6 a the width of the 80D sensor wide side? It locks only in the 150mm position. Mode, ISO Sensitivity (Recommended Exposure Index), Still images: ISO 100-51200 (ISO numbers from 50 to 204800 can be set as expanded ISO), AUTO (ISO 100-12800, selectable lower limit and upper limit), Movies: ISO 100-51200 equivalent (ISO numbers up to 102400 can be set as expanded ISO), AUTO (ISO 100-12800, selectable lower limit and upper limit), 1.3 cm (0.5 type) electronic viewfinder (Quad-VGA OLED), Approx. Keep it up. Your troubles with the EF-S 55-250 IS STM rang a familiar bell for me. Hoi Dustin ever tried the sigma 150 2.8 dgwithout os? Quick question. http://www.readdailynews.com/news-6180485_3.html. Thanks. Ive tested the SP primes at a recent Tamron event. I have this lens for a year now and the primar y use for it is landscape tripod shooting. Maybe sell some less versatile glass. what you did in this review was (imho) answering questions of many people like me. What's holding me back is I already own the 28mm f/2.8 IS with which I am very pleased, so I don't know if there is enough difference here to justify the purchase. I really enjoy your videos reviews. I havent used either of the lenses on a 5DMKII, but I wouldnt expect the Sigma to focus better (not my experience at all). Anyway, just read your another article with this tamron 28-300 at quebec city. up fo your excellnt informatin you have got here on this pst. Thanks for the nice feedback, Victor. Wonderful. It will depress that pin and keep it out of your way. Expect to see more gear being produced in factories elsewhere by Japanese companies in the future. The lens is actually easier to visually focus than most other MF lenses because of its extreme sharpness. so while this gives a good "real life" overview i think the lens would have yieled better results on some images using a tripod. I was wondering will it be a good idea to upgrade to 100-400 MKII + 1.4 extender. Stumbled at your reviews a while back in YouTube. I was really, really disappointed when Canon failed to put the flip-out screen in both the 5DIII and the 6D. Thanks for the reply on e-mail. alle unsere Produkte, ausgenommen Zubehr, https://asgoodasnew.de/Foto-Video/Sony-Alpha-7R-IV-schwarz-gut.html. 4) The distortion into Wideangle is less than the 24-105 L Zeiss Zeiss Batis 25mm f2.0 6 dome port with focus control I use Canon EOS 70D + Canon 100-400mm F4.5-5.6L IS USM Mark II . At the same time, I dont think you would take a huge image quality hit and the focal length is, of course, exceptional in the 28-300mm. A few quirks, but I think its going to be an impressive lens. Todd, I did read that article. Way cool! Thanks Dustin for your comments. Maybe its a combination of zoom/hunting/mass-of-lens thats causing the problem. Andrew, thats a pretty balanced take on the two cameras. Great review of a masterpiece! Verkaufe mein Sony Alpha A7 IV Body. I just want to make sure I'm clear on one point: I use a 6D, and I understand from the review that the Canon 1.4x teleconverter will not focus on the 6D with this lens but that the much less expensive Kenko one will.

Sitemap 13